Healthcare Providers & Facilities in Clayton, CA
Public healthcare directory of 91 individual practitioners and 18 healthcare facilities located in Clayton, California.
Medical Specialties in Clayton
Select a specialty to view practitioner listings, practice locations, and qualifications.
All Specialties in Clayton
Specialties with enough public records for a comparison with U.S. figures, besides those named above, plus 28 more with at least one listed practitioner. Number of practitioners in brackets.
Allopathic & Osteopathic Physicians
- Family Medicine (2)
- Internal Medicine (1)
- Obstetrics & Gynecology (1)
Behavioral Health & Social Service Providers
Dental Providers
Nursing Service Providers
Other Service Providers
- Specialist (1)
Physician Assistants & Advanced Practice Nursing Providers
Respiratory, Developmental, Rehabilitative and Restorative Service Providers
Speech, Language and Hearing Service Providers
Featured Healthcare Providers in Clayton
Practitioner profiles in Clayton, CA with recent CMS Medicare or Open Payments data.
Christine Mitry , RPH
Pharmacist
Dr. Chan-Cheong Lee , PharmD
Pharmacist
Alexandra Hom , PA-C
Physician Assistant
Dr. Douglas Novotny , PhD
Psychologist - Clinical
Dr. Angel Awad , DDS
Dentist
Dr. Melanie Chrobot , PharmD
Pharmacist
Largest Cities in California
Other California cities with a full directory, by the number of active practitioners listed in NPPES.
How Clayton compares with the U.S.
Compared with the U.S. as a whole, Clayton has more Pharmacists (1.6x) per 100,000 residents.
Clayton has 832 active clinicians per 100,000 residents, compared with 2,198 for the U.S.
What these numbers mean
Clinicians per 100,000 residents compares places of different sizes. We count active clinicians who list a practice address in the area in the federal NPI registry (NPPES) and divide by the number of people who live there, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The U.S. rate is the same calculation for the whole country.
A higher number does not mean it is easier to get an appointment, that wait times are shorter, or that care is better. It also does not show how many clinicians are accepting new patients or which insurance plans they take. A lower number does not by itself mean there is a shortage.
City counts use the city name in each clinician's practice address. That postal city can cover a larger or smaller area than the city limits the Census Bureau uses for population, and many clinicians list only one address even if they work in several places. Cities with hospitals or large medical centers often list more specialists than the number of residents alone would suggest, because patients also come from nearby areas.
Too few clinicians in Clayton are listed in the CMS Medicare file to report Medicare assignment or telehealth shares.
These figures summarize public federal data. They do not measure quality of care, appointment availability, or whether a clinician accepts your insurance or new patients. Registry addresses can be out of date. Please confirm details directly with the office and your plan. This information is not medical advice.
Prepared by T-MedInfo from NPPES, CMS and U.S. Census Bureau data. Questions or corrections: support@true-medinfo.com · Methodology
Sources: Clinician counts and practice addresses: NPPES NPI Registry, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), data as of August 2026. Population: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates, Table B01003 (Total Population).
Clayton CMS Healthcare & Financial Disclosures
CMS Part D Prescribers (2024), Open Payments (program year 2025) and Part B (2024) data for Clayton, CA
Healthcare operations in Clayton, CA encompass 91 active individual practitioners and 18 registered medical facilities across 29 clinical specialties.
According to CMS Medicare Part D analytics for 2024, prescription drug volume in Clayton accounts for $0.7 Million across 10,419 prescription claims. Open Payments data for program year 2025 list $0.0 Million in payments reported by companies; a reported payment does not necessarily mean the financial relationship is improper.